14 Comments
User's avatar
Daniel C Mayer's avatar

Francisco, this historic juncture is the perfect opportunity for you to be 100% scientific, as you claim and aim to be. Articulate two patently falsifiable statements about Trump and Israel vis a vis Iran in the near future, and put them to the test: one that would clearly disprove your hypothesis, and one that would clearly demonstrate it. State both clearly and provide a reasonable time frame to assess them. Then revisit them to make that assessment.

Expand full comment
Robert Shannon's avatar

And now an article appears about Trumps visit today denouncing neocons and interventionists and opens up Syria with Saudi Arabia, Emeritus and others to invest in the Arab development os Syria. So according to your theory, hasn't he driven the final nail into Israel?

Expand full comment
Robert Shannon's avatar

Damnit man, you are making me ill because You most likely are right. What you have laid out and how seems to follow scientific theory and hypothesis and so far its' adding up to 'right'. I will be watching how the rest of the story develops, but I see now its logic, the results of which I don't like. How do we get people to see the picture more clearly because reporting has been so rosy by the press who supports Trump and the left press is too stupid to understand it.

Expand full comment
Francisco Gil-White's avatar

That's not how it works. But I am enjoying your awakening.

This is how it works: all of the media (and much else) is in thrall to the CIA. Very tightly controlled. The left and the right is all the same. It is all a simulation.

https://franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/orson-welles-war-of-the-worlds-1938-panic

Read that one. I think you'll enjoy it.

Expand full comment
Chuck Flounder's avatar

Oh boy, Elon is going to help Arabs build more tunnels! I wonder what they will do with them. The suspense is killing me...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6kvZnXSuDI

Expand full comment
Chuck Flounder's avatar

I just watched your interview from a month ago, discussing the staggeringly counterproductive Israeli hostage negotiations, and I thought of this interesting factoid I stumbled upon way back in October; the curious case of Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin...

https://x.com/PelosiTracker_/status/1841511374545150396

As it happens, AIPAC seems to be his largest donor...

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/markwayne-mullin/contributors?cid=N00033410&cycle=2022&recs=100&type=C

Which makes stuff like this even more troubling...

https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-sword-is-coming-idf-email-warned-of-hamas-plans-days-before-oct-7-report/

Expand full comment
sean anderson's avatar

Dear Francisco: Sadly I cannot find fault with your analysis of Trump as the Machiavellian willing to sacrifice Israel. Only possible counterargument might be that the appointment of Sean Curren was a monumentally stupid decision like his previous error of being duped by Fauxchi et al into OWS - maybe something like a Stockholm Syndrome in which (if the assassination attempt were genuine) of embracing Curren as some sort of personal savior instead of the dunce he would have had to have been if the assassination attempt had not been staged.

As for Trump-olators dropping subscriptions to MOR if they are faithful Jews or Christians they should remember Psalm 146:3 not to put their trust in a prince, a mere son of man.

Expand full comment
Chuck Flounder's avatar

I was deeply disturbed to read about Trump's big development bid in Qatar, as well as military drones approved for sale to Qatar by the State Dept in March; his new flying palace is just the cherry on top.

I must agree with your argument, because I can't think of a better way to explain the history of US presidents behaving very suspiciously in regard to Israel, and I am often reminded of the Henry Kissinger aphorism: "To be an enemy of the United States can be dangerous; but to be a friend can be fatal."

While we're on the subject, I also have some uncomfortable reservations about Netanyahu and senior IDF officers after October 7. Numerous female IDF soldiers who were tasked with Gaza border zone surveillance have made public statements that they warned commanding officers about unusual military exercises being conducted in the weeks before the attack, and nothing was done to follow up on their reports. But even lacking such incriminating statements, there is no way in hell smart military leaders could get caught so flat-footed on the 50th anniversary of an earlier catastrophic surprise attack. The lame excuse from IDF reps was that they had been anticipating a possible raid from the West Bank, but that is no reason to leave the Gaza region undefended. The whole thing smells rotten, and yet: Could Jews collude in such a monstrous scheme against their own people? It's difficult to comprehend either way.

Then again, I can't wrap my mind around the seemingly concerted effort by western leaders to allow the migration of jihadists into their own societies. I understand that they are a destabilizer of democracy, which might appeal to psychopathic authoritarians. But why are powerful elites so sanguine about their ability to manage the resulting carnage? And who wants to live like that, even with bodyguards in a fortified compound? It's hard to see their motivation, and yet there is a consistent global pattern hiding in plain sight.

Do you have any sort of behavioral explanation based on historical analogies that describes not only the cynical will to power, but the notion that the elites seek to improve their quality of life by cooperating with the Islamists? And also, if the rulers of the most powerful nations are all on the same sheet music, how has Israel survived this long? So many questions...

Expand full comment
sean anderson's avatar

I am guessing at an answer to your very good question why our elites would allow the degradation of our western by encouraged immigration of what are essentially barbarians. I accept Francisco’s analysis of pre-Christian Graeco-Roman as an anti-thesis of the Semitic civilization. I will call it “cultural atavism.” I believe that today’s western elites hanker for the cruel powers that the pre-Christian Graeco-Roman elites had. The importation of populations intrinsically hostile to the Judeo-Christian civilization allows a transition to a society allowing a more authoritarian rule. The elites will gain more arbitrary power relative to their native citizens although they may have to make at least a nominal conversion to Islam - nominal because in their private palaces and compounds they can continue to lead the hedonistic lifestyles out of the eyesight of the masses much as the elites of the Arabian peninsula also do today.

I really hoped Trump would not have emerged as the Machiavellian willing to sacrifice Israel in his quest for power but I found Francisco’s analysis airtight.

Expand full comment
Chuck Flounder's avatar

I wonder, though, just how far islamic elites are willing to collaborate with western elites. Look how fast Germany's pact with Russia fell apart in WWII. I enjoyed The Man In The High Castle, but it's hard to imagine any sort of harmonious partnership between Japan and Germany, since they both relied on racial supremacy theories. And look at the tenuous cooperation between Russia and China today, brittle as a saltine cracker. The elites must be delusional. Of course they can still ruin life for everyone else.

Expand full comment
sean anderson's avatar

I believe in Rabbi Elie Mischel’s analysis of Biblical prophecy outlined in his book “The War Against the Bible: Ishmael, Esau and Israel at the End Times.” According to this analysis Esau/Edom is “Rome” I.e. the Western world and Ishmael is Islam. They form a sort of tactical alliance since the materialists of the West depends on Arab oil while the Islamic world is completely dependent on the West for technology without which their economies and militaries are deficient. In a callous cost-benefit analysis the West writes off Israel as expendable. However it is merely a tactical alliance and once Ishmael betrays Esau then the latter will turn upon the former with devastating force. Israel’s survival will only be through Divine intervention though the days preceding it will be the days of “Jacob’s trouble.” This is, of course, a belief based on theology and I do not expect others to share these beliefs. But examined merely from a materialist outlook the situation fur Israel looks grim.

Expand full comment
Chuck Flounder's avatar

I guess I better read that book, just in case...

Expand full comment
Danny's avatar

There weren't any better options. The Biden/Harris administration was completely ideologically captured and infiltrated with Islamic Republic simps. I watched in horror as ex-CIA agent Andrew Bustamante made the podcast rounds glazing for the Islamic Republic and calling Israel a theocracy. State dept officials on 60 mins claiming Harris lost because of "support" for Israel. I knew voting for someone as fickle as Trump there would be disappointments, I only hope Trump being Trump will also screw over the Islamists.

Expand full comment
@isknot's avatar

Thanks Francisco. We then can only hope in Hope that there is some unaccounted for practical and also some unaccounted for unfathomable 'agent' at work.

Expand full comment