Outstanding. Thanks. Just in case, and I may be 'taking coals to Newcastle'; but, if one uses google or youtube to search to learn about Jewish knowledge/ideas/practices - most of what comes up immediately is from sites of proseltyizing Christian individuals and their own group, or other such groups. In other words, dare I saw from a general Jewish perspective such sources are not bona fide. At least not in our terms. Even if it is a said Jewish person with a twist:) Additionally to really understand even a brief or simple bit of Jewish knowledge/ideas/practices I personally would only recommend what are referred to too often as 'orthodox'. Also the original language of the material depending on the broad area such as Torah is primarily Hebrew, Talmud is primarily Aramaic with a continum of references to the Torah which is itself Hebrew. There is a well established norm of 'orthodox' Rabbis giving a talk or lesson primarily in English but which by the nature of our real Culture will use specific words of Hebrew that a direct simple translation into English and the discourse continues primarily (95%) in English. Here is a 6 minutes insight into the actual Source/Sources of the phenomeon that you have written about but here explained in English and from within the Jewish Culture. As a side note, it is imperative for all to understand that there is an historic and permanent 'exchange' between and with Non-Jews and Jews. As a teacher in arts, for decades I have said "We are all in this together". As always, ever thankful for your Research and Writings and Generous attempts for us all in the management of reality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm-VUincHEY
lots of good points here. Although I'm not sure I like calling the professors 'cultural marxists' for these reasons: while it is certainly true that the tools of Western elites like calling themselves 'marxists', they are (as you well document) disciples of the Rockefeller/CIA education system. They are in fact philo-nazis, glorifiers of fascism, and huge liars. The US government has always been rabidly anti-communist, Russophobic, and likely anti-marxist too (I'm not sure of exactly what a 'marxist' is, but Western fascists like using this label which makes them look 'cool' to Western college kids).
And obviously there are numerous little points that the Western leftist cannot address: Why was Husseini doing radio propaganda against the Serbs? The Serbs were (mostly) not Jewish, they were not in palestine. So why was he railing against them and teaching SS troops on how to kill them?
And the current left insists that Israel (and Jews) have great control over US policy--but they can never explain exactly when/how they took over control of this policy from the philo-nazis that ran operation paperclip and numerous other nazi-importation projects.
The meticulously documented works of John Loftus and the late Charles R. Allen Jr go into numerous nazi criminals that were allowed entry into the US and were living in the US as of the mid 1980s or so. And obviously none of this is possible if US policy is influenced by Jewish lobbies.
In general, I've been trying to get others to understand that the *actual* influence of Jews on a country's policy is inversely related to the number of articles and featured talking heads complaining that Jews are controlling the policy. This is a 'meta' level lesson that many do not grasp--that thousands of tweets complaining about Israel (from media talking heads, politicians, etc) means that our media and policy are not controlled by Israel in any way. Perhaps you can help get others to grasp this simple concept.
I think you are having trouble with this because you believe that our psychopathic Western bosses don't like Marxism. I believe you are mistaken. Think about it. Why have the bosses --who control the boards of trustees of the universities--allowed the universities to have become flooded with Marxist professors in the last seven decades? It was not always so. In the first half of the 20th century, university professors were overwhelmingly conservative. There is no law saying that a professor must be a leftist. This was engineered.
what is a 'marxist'?? For certain they align with the 'left' on the Western political spectrum--which is devised by the same people that rescued and ratlined tens of thousands of nazi criminals. They like calling themselves 'marxist'. Do Marxists have a natural affinity for Eichmann and Husseini??
we're getting deeply into semantics, but since we're certainly not anti-semantic here, supposedly in Mein Kampf Hitler expressed a hatred of Marxists, advocating for the destruction of Marxism in all its shapes and forms. So I maintain that these professors are actually neo-nazis calling themselves 'Marxists'. I theorize that they do this to look 'cool' to young people of the West. They can't actually say, 'I was educated in Rockefeller/CIA/eugenics/Nazi sponsoring propaganda'. Based on what Hitler says about Marxism in Mein Kampf, a 'marxist' that supports Husseini and Eichmann is not really a marxist, but rather a fraud. So in short my take is that these professors are cultural nazis, consistent with all we know about CIA support for eugenics, the nazis, rescuing and ratlining nazis...
Jared Israel's series of articles on the Weathermen are the best (and maybe only) work that delves into how the elite powers of the US replaced the genuine SDS movement at Harvard with Ayers' group. Ayers group may have been among the first to make the 'marxist' label look cool--but they were pets of the US establishment, promoters of racial division and antisemitism.
I've read similar about Steinem and it seems to be true. Her whole 'feminist movement' was entirely silent on numerous issues where it should not have been. The more you read, the more you see that the 'media celebrated' heroes of the last 50+ years are all deliberately promoted, part of a more nefarious agenda. Here's the first Ayers article. IMO, a lay person cannot and will never understand how the feds hijack genuine anti-establishment movements until they read and absorb this series: http://tenc.net/exhumed.htm
That is a very big compliment. Many thanks. I have studied Marshall Rosenberg for a few years. And I have even taught his methods. He was really onto something with his non-violent communication. And that's a real science.
Outstanding. Thanks. Just in case, and I may be 'taking coals to Newcastle'; but, if one uses google or youtube to search to learn about Jewish knowledge/ideas/practices - most of what comes up immediately is from sites of proseltyizing Christian individuals and their own group, or other such groups. In other words, dare I saw from a general Jewish perspective such sources are not bona fide. At least not in our terms. Even if it is a said Jewish person with a twist:) Additionally to really understand even a brief or simple bit of Jewish knowledge/ideas/practices I personally would only recommend what are referred to too often as 'orthodox'. Also the original language of the material depending on the broad area such as Torah is primarily Hebrew, Talmud is primarily Aramaic with a continum of references to the Torah which is itself Hebrew. There is a well established norm of 'orthodox' Rabbis giving a talk or lesson primarily in English but which by the nature of our real Culture will use specific words of Hebrew that a direct simple translation into English and the discourse continues primarily (95%) in English. Here is a 6 minutes insight into the actual Source/Sources of the phenomeon that you have written about but here explained in English and from within the Jewish Culture. As a side note, it is imperative for all to understand that there is an historic and permanent 'exchange' between and with Non-Jews and Jews. As a teacher in arts, for decades I have said "We are all in this together". As always, ever thankful for your Research and Writings and Generous attempts for us all in the management of reality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm-VUincHEY
lots of good points here. Although I'm not sure I like calling the professors 'cultural marxists' for these reasons: while it is certainly true that the tools of Western elites like calling themselves 'marxists', they are (as you well document) disciples of the Rockefeller/CIA education system. They are in fact philo-nazis, glorifiers of fascism, and huge liars. The US government has always been rabidly anti-communist, Russophobic, and likely anti-marxist too (I'm not sure of exactly what a 'marxist' is, but Western fascists like using this label which makes them look 'cool' to Western college kids).
And obviously there are numerous little points that the Western leftist cannot address: Why was Husseini doing radio propaganda against the Serbs? The Serbs were (mostly) not Jewish, they were not in palestine. So why was he railing against them and teaching SS troops on how to kill them?
And the current left insists that Israel (and Jews) have great control over US policy--but they can never explain exactly when/how they took over control of this policy from the philo-nazis that ran operation paperclip and numerous other nazi-importation projects.
The meticulously documented works of John Loftus and the late Charles R. Allen Jr go into numerous nazi criminals that were allowed entry into the US and were living in the US as of the mid 1980s or so. And obviously none of this is possible if US policy is influenced by Jewish lobbies.
In general, I've been trying to get others to understand that the *actual* influence of Jews on a country's policy is inversely related to the number of articles and featured talking heads complaining that Jews are controlling the policy. This is a 'meta' level lesson that many do not grasp--that thousands of tweets complaining about Israel (from media talking heads, politicians, etc) means that our media and policy are not controlled by Israel in any way. Perhaps you can help get others to grasp this simple concept.
I think you are having trouble with this because you believe that our psychopathic Western bosses don't like Marxism. I believe you are mistaken. Think about it. Why have the bosses --who control the boards of trustees of the universities--allowed the universities to have become flooded with Marxist professors in the last seven decades? It was not always so. In the first half of the 20th century, university professors were overwhelmingly conservative. There is no law saying that a professor must be a leftist. This was engineered.
what is a 'marxist'?? For certain they align with the 'left' on the Western political spectrum--which is devised by the same people that rescued and ratlined tens of thousands of nazi criminals. They like calling themselves 'marxist'. Do Marxists have a natural affinity for Eichmann and Husseini??
They do. Now you understand.
we're getting deeply into semantics, but since we're certainly not anti-semantic here, supposedly in Mein Kampf Hitler expressed a hatred of Marxists, advocating for the destruction of Marxism in all its shapes and forms. So I maintain that these professors are actually neo-nazis calling themselves 'Marxists'. I theorize that they do this to look 'cool' to young people of the West. They can't actually say, 'I was educated in Rockefeller/CIA/eugenics/Nazi sponsoring propaganda'. Based on what Hitler says about Marxism in Mein Kampf, a 'marxist' that supports Husseini and Eichmann is not really a marxist, but rather a fraud. So in short my take is that these professors are cultural nazis, consistent with all we know about CIA support for eugenics, the nazis, rescuing and ratlining nazis...
I really like this comment. But I also agree that phony professors pretending to be anything (Marxists, liberals, anything) are easily produced.
Jared Israel's series of articles on the Weathermen are the best (and maybe only) work that delves into how the elite powers of the US replaced the genuine SDS movement at Harvard with Ayers' group. Ayers group may have been among the first to make the 'marxist' label look cool--but they were pets of the US establishment, promoters of racial division and antisemitism.
I've read similar about Steinem and it seems to be true. Her whole 'feminist movement' was entirely silent on numerous issues where it should not have been. The more you read, the more you see that the 'media celebrated' heroes of the last 50+ years are all deliberately promoted, part of a more nefarious agenda. Here's the first Ayers article. IMO, a lay person cannot and will never understand how the feds hijack genuine anti-establishment movements until they read and absorb this series: http://tenc.net/exhumed.htm
No, it is not easy. But civil war will be even tougher.
I hear ya. All extremes are bad. We just have to... chill.
That is a very big compliment. Many thanks. I have studied Marshall Rosenberg for a few years. And I have even taught his methods. He was really onto something with his non-violent communication. And that's a real science.
I highly recommend it!!
Glad to have you back. I knew you couldn't stay away!