Haven’t you just proven where ChatGpt is totally fallible in that you provided it information re: that is refuted from other sources that S is not protecting civilians as described but is killing just to eliminate them. Leaders of S are expressing the total removal of the population and is not providing electricity and water to those people as suggested. Civilians of S are voicing total elimination of said population with removal of those people from their areas without providing alternative areas for them to live in. Seems this comes under the genocide definition.
Haven’t you just proven where ChatGpt is totally fallible in that you provided it information re: that is refuted from other sources that S is not protecting civilians as described but is killing just to eliminate them. Leaders of S are expressing the total removal of the population and is not providing electricity and water to those people as suggested. Civilians of S are voicing total elimination of said population with removal of those people from their areas without providing alternative areas for them to live in. Seems this comes under the genocide definition.
Thank you for your question. My reply is here:
https://franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/can-chatgpt-distinguish-truth-from-propaganda