Well, is it possible that Democrats wanted to lose the 2024 elections because they know that the national debt (among other things) has gotten so bad that any minute now the whole house of cards might come crumbling down and they don't want to be there to take the blame when it happens? Just a thought...
interesting clip someone posted on x: Trump sitting next to Obama at Carter's funeral, they're chatting and friendly with each other. What a surprise! ;-)
1) I'm skeptical even of how 'real' the vote count numbers are. Biden ran for potus repeatedly back when he was actually lucid, and he'd get trounced. Yet in 2020 he got over 81M votes. I find that number to be entirely absurd. Obama was obviously far more charismatic and never came remotely close to that number. So I think the feds can fabricate whatever vote counts they want.
2) I've long believed that Trump is sort of living a pro-wrestling type role. There is a word for gullible people that believe all the scripts: a 'mark'. It is my opinion (imo) that the entire trial a while back, the one where the media kept featuring that ominous, serious looking Trump in his mugshot, imo that was an entirely fake trial. Note that he did not actually get in any trouble at all. The 'marks' are the ones that believe in the kayfabe: 'he's a convicted whatever, blah blah'. Similarly, Hillary never got in trouble for any of that email server stuff. We are presented with fake 'trials' and similar fake 'browbeatings', which result in no one actually getting in trouble for anything. The modern day 'marks' are the ones that were obsessively hating Trump for the last 9 years, obsessively supporting their hero Fauci.
3) I don't think in any way he can 'decide' US policy; moreso I think he is playing his role--I think fundamentally he is 'good' and here is why: the Clintons, Bidens, and Obamas seem to all be tremendous grifters, fleecing the masses, condescending types. The Biden children are amoral degenerates (granted his daughter was messed up maybe due to Joe showering with her and causing her to have psychological issues). The Bidens are just huge amoral grifters.
Trump's kids and grandkids are basically all clean-cut, educated, behave in accordance with normal societal expectations and standards. I think and hope that Trump truly does care about the type of country and world he wants his kids and grandkids to live in. I get none of this intuition from the Clintons, Obamas, or Bidens (in particular).
Professor Gil White you described the electoral college system as "astonishingly archaic and idiotic." What is the basis for this characterization? The reason I ask is that the democrat party here in the US has the same attitude, which I have thought of as an indication that they don't care why we have the electoral college system in the first place. If it doesn't benefit them, they don't want it. But you do not have anything to lose by it. Why do you oppose it?
Well, the electoral college system makes it possible for a candidate to lose the popular vote but win the presidency. That is fundamentally undemocratic. The question is not which party it benefits, because I believe both parties are controlled by US Intelligence. So that doesn't really matter. But as design, it is not a democratic design, because if we did have real parties, it makes no sense for the party that lost the popular vote to take power.
I also couldn’t make heads or tail from the string of events surrounding both assassination attempts. George Webb’s Orange Task Force did a good job tracing the facts, yet his excellent detective work stopped short of explaining why Rogan would allow about one fourth of the 2 hour-long interview to be focused on wrestling, of all things.
It felt as if Trump had used his knowledge of Rogan’s love of the sport to win the day. After reading your analysis, I now wonder if what we (the public) witnessed that day was the intellectual equivalent of a wrestling match between mutually respectful equals.
Isn’t that element of unpredictability that both men share precisely what may knock the cringiest Master Behemoth off its feet? Isn’t it a fighting chance worth entertaining … and hopefully being entertained by?
Your articles and perception of reality are always illuminating and absolutely riveting. I could not believe that a candidate as awful as Kamala Harris and her pathetic side kick could garner a single vote, let alone almost half of them. What perplexes me is how so many millions of people could be taken in by such inane stupidity. I so want to believe that Trump can be the agent of change we are longing for, but he well may not be. I look forward to your next instalment with anticipation as always.
Where electoral politics is concerned, the management of reality is structured around making some root for one candidate, and some for the other. The more you love your own candidate and hate the other, the more invested you become in electoral politics as such--the more REAL it becomes for you. The alternation (sometimes a Republican wins, sometimes a Democrat) makes it seem as if the votes really matter. And the extremity of views expressed in some domains, which make the parties seem very different, convinces you that the choice matters.
For those of us who consider all of this a carefully orchestrated show, it is interesting that there hasn't been a comfortable spread in a US election (say, above 10%) since Ronald Reagan defeated Walter Mondale in 1984.
At the same time that the elections have become very close (and remained that way), the ideologies have evolved to make US citizens feel the other side is morally unacceptable, to make them feel that they are in an existential fight. This is a recipe for civil war. And civil war is the perfect excuse to declare a state of emergency and impose totalitarianism.
Some people think Trump is the Messiah; others think he is the devil. Flip it around: some people think that woke (represented by Harris) is the superior moral product, and they believe those who oppose it are evil right-wing fascists. Everybody believes that everything is at stake, and they are divided right down the middle. But is this organic? Or are we being herded?
Woke was carefully prepared, nurtured, and administered to the young by the bosses at elite universities.
What about Trump? Is HE organic?
If we conclude that he isn't, then it follows that the bosses want a civil war.
One of the problematic things about elections in the US currently is the massive amount of cheating going on, most of which is not realized or understood until after the election. There are an almost infinite ways to cheat with electronic voting. So the official results of the popular vote are problematic. Both parties engage in ballot fraud, however the sum total of the fraud leans in the direction of electing non-MAGA candidates from the top of the ballot to the bottom. The elements of fraud in the 2020 election which have been so far revealed have been covered up in the mainstream media. We will not know the degree to which cheating occurred in the 2024 election until after Trump is elected, as he has committed to revealing who has cheated and in which elections they cheated.
So while I take your point that Trump appears not to have achieved a landslide victory, I do not know what the truth is about how much cheating may have given the appearance that Kamala Harris didn't lose by much. The goal of those who direct the cheating is to make it seem like it's anyone's election to lose: they aim to make it appear that the election is really close, this is how they get away with cheating. In 2020 they added just enough fake ballots to eke out a win for Biden, but not enough to make it seem he won by a landslide. If they did the latter their cheating would look obvious.
Also whenever there has been cheating since 2020, it has always benefitted democrats at the expense of Republicans.
I take your point. But my point remains. Regardless of how much cheating is going on, that is the state of affairs. With a reasonable candidate, the Democrats could have won. My personal view is that there wasn't a lot of cheating this time around. I believe the real cheating has to do with centralized control of both parties.
Clearly Trump's middle east policies will reveal if he is for real. However, I propose that his MAHA performance will be even more revealing. Certainly rfkJr is not a con artist, he is as real as it gets. Was he conned by Trump? We will soon find out.
What I have noticed is that one of my friends who is an East Coast Democrat and who used to believe all of the contrived TDS claptrap has become very quiet. But he is not alone. I find this sudden quietude on what used to be a rambunctious riotous left mystifying.
I can't call any of your great essays 'the best'. I'm a fan. Keep fanning the flames of pre-digested acceptable reality and keep teaching us the insights of Management of Reality. Long ago one of my experimental little theatre shows was titled "Everyday Non-Reality". I didn't buy 'norm' then nor do I now. This essay was delightful and your most Puck-ish one so far.
Well, I agree that history in the making is often more insane than the wildest of the scripted scenarios. But is it a proof that history events are being scripted from a scenario written by humans?
I don't think so. In fact, it would rather be quite the opposite.
If the purpose of the show was to deceipt us, then the writers would have resorted to a "credible" story, certainly not one in which exceptionally bad actors run incredibly risky stunts where the actor who has the first role have very high chances of getting actually killed.
This may have been the case if we were in a TV show that tries to keep the audience entertained and strapped to their TV sets. But according to the Management of Reality hypothesis, the bosses only try to cover their tracks making us believe that our votes count while making the real policy decisions. So what would be the purpose of producing a plot so insane that so many would find hard to believe?
History is bigger than anything anyone could ever have imagined.
In the Jewish tradition we say that God rules the world by "מידה כנגד מידה". His Immanent justice punishes the wicked by the exact same measure by which they exert their bad deeds.
The bosses had tried to deceit humanity with distorted reality. So He creates a reality than even them could not have thought about, to destroy their evil plans by their own rules.
You are right in identifying that Trump was once at the core of the show system. And he indeed knows more than anybody how mass media works, how they run a show with politicians to produce deceit. Does this knowledge mean that he shares their goal of enslaving humanity. Not necessarily. But like Moses, who grew up in Paraoh's home was uniquely positioned to free the Hebrew slaves from Egypt, Trump is in the unique position to fight and destroy the system that wants to enslave humanity again.
And God definitely helps him. Sometimes in unbelievable ways.
Trump is on a learning curve. He even has a new haircut. He has for example at least one of his dualities that is very interesting. He is actually, an extraordinary Listener!!!! But he chooses how to reply. There have been a few times on the more casual recent interviews (recent as in the leadup to and soon after the election) in some he didn't quite hear a few words from the interviewer. Another of his dualities is that he can be ice cold, when he chooses. But it is so obvious in so many incidents, particularly live situations in which it is blatant he has a LOT of empathy for any average person. There are numerous well known people in journalism etc. who admit to being shocked at how amazingly casual and relaxed and 'down home' Trump is.... when he chooses. One fab example from a few years ago is from super podcaster Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report. As he tells of being at a dinner event with Trump and what happened when they met. At any rate... it is within my Tradition that we wish all leaders to merit the best for making Righteous decisions. We have our own understanding of how to 'manage reality' and how 'reality manages us'. As Ariel I in Comment above noted in his own way. My single favorite line from Shakespeare and I quote it endlessly: "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" - Hamlet to his friend Horatio. Shakespeare to all of us. There is a wonderful 'young' teacher active with a collection of his weekly lessons on youtube. He has a remarkable Mind to say the least. He teaches Science and Maths to high school/undergraduate levels. But he is completely literate in the Jewish canon and exceptionally articulate. His video talks themselves are brilliant state-of-the-art in online presentation! He, one can say, please pardon the simile - he is an expert at explaining the web of the Jewish system of 'managing reality' and/or facing Reality in its complex web of interacting systems. As Homeostasis is said to 'manage' all the systems of Physiology as a Whole. Maybe that is no longer discussed or believed in the worlds of Science? Anyways that wiz bang chilled out teacher is Efraim Palvanov.
Well, is it possible that Democrats wanted to lose the 2024 elections because they know that the national debt (among other things) has gotten so bad that any minute now the whole house of cards might come crumbling down and they don't want to be there to take the blame when it happens? Just a thought...
interesting clip someone posted on x: Trump sitting next to Obama at Carter's funeral, they're chatting and friendly with each other. What a surprise! ;-)
good article. Various thoughts come to mind:
1) I'm skeptical even of how 'real' the vote count numbers are. Biden ran for potus repeatedly back when he was actually lucid, and he'd get trounced. Yet in 2020 he got over 81M votes. I find that number to be entirely absurd. Obama was obviously far more charismatic and never came remotely close to that number. So I think the feds can fabricate whatever vote counts they want.
2) I've long believed that Trump is sort of living a pro-wrestling type role. There is a word for gullible people that believe all the scripts: a 'mark'. It is my opinion (imo) that the entire trial a while back, the one where the media kept featuring that ominous, serious looking Trump in his mugshot, imo that was an entirely fake trial. Note that he did not actually get in any trouble at all. The 'marks' are the ones that believe in the kayfabe: 'he's a convicted whatever, blah blah'. Similarly, Hillary never got in trouble for any of that email server stuff. We are presented with fake 'trials' and similar fake 'browbeatings', which result in no one actually getting in trouble for anything. The modern day 'marks' are the ones that were obsessively hating Trump for the last 9 years, obsessively supporting their hero Fauci.
3) I don't think in any way he can 'decide' US policy; moreso I think he is playing his role--I think fundamentally he is 'good' and here is why: the Clintons, Bidens, and Obamas seem to all be tremendous grifters, fleecing the masses, condescending types. The Biden children are amoral degenerates (granted his daughter was messed up maybe due to Joe showering with her and causing her to have psychological issues). The Bidens are just huge amoral grifters.
Trump's kids and grandkids are basically all clean-cut, educated, behave in accordance with normal societal expectations and standards. I think and hope that Trump truly does care about the type of country and world he wants his kids and grandkids to live in. I get none of this intuition from the Clintons, Obamas, or Bidens (in particular).
The 2020 election was totally rigged, the documentary 2000 mules comes to mind about it
I suspect it's all as real as pro-wrestling, and the 2020 'screwjob' was part of the show.
Professor Gil White you described the electoral college system as "astonishingly archaic and idiotic." What is the basis for this characterization? The reason I ask is that the democrat party here in the US has the same attitude, which I have thought of as an indication that they don't care why we have the electoral college system in the first place. If it doesn't benefit them, they don't want it. But you do not have anything to lose by it. Why do you oppose it?
Well, the electoral college system makes it possible for a candidate to lose the popular vote but win the presidency. That is fundamentally undemocratic. The question is not which party it benefits, because I believe both parties are controlled by US Intelligence. So that doesn't really matter. But as design, it is not a democratic design, because if we did have real parties, it makes no sense for the party that lost the popular vote to take power.
Thank you for another enlightening article.
I also couldn’t make heads or tail from the string of events surrounding both assassination attempts. George Webb’s Orange Task Force did a good job tracing the facts, yet his excellent detective work stopped short of explaining why Rogan would allow about one fourth of the 2 hour-long interview to be focused on wrestling, of all things.
It felt as if Trump had used his knowledge of Rogan’s love of the sport to win the day. After reading your analysis, I now wonder if what we (the public) witnessed that day was the intellectual equivalent of a wrestling match between mutually respectful equals.
Isn’t that element of unpredictability that both men share precisely what may knock the cringiest Master Behemoth off its feet? Isn’t it a fighting chance worth entertaining … and hopefully being entertained by?
I look forward to Part 2.
Your articles and perception of reality are always illuminating and absolutely riveting. I could not believe that a candidate as awful as Kamala Harris and her pathetic side kick could garner a single vote, let alone almost half of them. What perplexes me is how so many millions of people could be taken in by such inane stupidity. I so want to believe that Trump can be the agent of change we are longing for, but he well may not be. I look forward to your next instalment with anticipation as always.
Where electoral politics is concerned, the management of reality is structured around making some root for one candidate, and some for the other. The more you love your own candidate and hate the other, the more invested you become in electoral politics as such--the more REAL it becomes for you. The alternation (sometimes a Republican wins, sometimes a Democrat) makes it seem as if the votes really matter. And the extremity of views expressed in some domains, which make the parties seem very different, convinces you that the choice matters.
For those of us who consider all of this a carefully orchestrated show, it is interesting that there hasn't been a comfortable spread in a US election (say, above 10%) since Ronald Reagan defeated Walter Mondale in 1984.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_United_States_presidential_election
At the same time that the elections have become very close (and remained that way), the ideologies have evolved to make US citizens feel the other side is morally unacceptable, to make them feel that they are in an existential fight. This is a recipe for civil war. And civil war is the perfect excuse to declare a state of emergency and impose totalitarianism.
Some people think Trump is the Messiah; others think he is the devil. Flip it around: some people think that woke (represented by Harris) is the superior moral product, and they believe those who oppose it are evil right-wing fascists. Everybody believes that everything is at stake, and they are divided right down the middle. But is this organic? Or are we being herded?
Woke was carefully prepared, nurtured, and administered to the young by the bosses at elite universities.
What about Trump? Is HE organic?
If we conclude that he isn't, then it follows that the bosses want a civil war.
One of the problematic things about elections in the US currently is the massive amount of cheating going on, most of which is not realized or understood until after the election. There are an almost infinite ways to cheat with electronic voting. So the official results of the popular vote are problematic. Both parties engage in ballot fraud, however the sum total of the fraud leans in the direction of electing non-MAGA candidates from the top of the ballot to the bottom. The elements of fraud in the 2020 election which have been so far revealed have been covered up in the mainstream media. We will not know the degree to which cheating occurred in the 2024 election until after Trump is elected, as he has committed to revealing who has cheated and in which elections they cheated.
So while I take your point that Trump appears not to have achieved a landslide victory, I do not know what the truth is about how much cheating may have given the appearance that Kamala Harris didn't lose by much. The goal of those who direct the cheating is to make it seem like it's anyone's election to lose: they aim to make it appear that the election is really close, this is how they get away with cheating. In 2020 they added just enough fake ballots to eke out a win for Biden, but not enough to make it seem he won by a landslide. If they did the latter their cheating would look obvious.
Also whenever there has been cheating since 2020, it has always benefitted democrats at the expense of Republicans.
I take your point. But my point remains. Regardless of how much cheating is going on, that is the state of affairs. With a reasonable candidate, the Democrats could have won. My personal view is that there wasn't a lot of cheating this time around. I believe the real cheating has to do with centralized control of both parties.
Clearly Trump's middle east policies will reveal if he is for real. However, I propose that his MAHA performance will be even more revealing. Certainly rfkJr is not a con artist, he is as real as it gets. Was he conned by Trump? We will soon find out.
What I have noticed is that one of my friends who is an East Coast Democrat and who used to believe all of the contrived TDS claptrap has become very quiet. But he is not alone. I find this sudden quietude on what used to be a rambunctious riotous left mystifying.
Same here....
I am sending them this great article...
We'll see how they react
I can't call any of your great essays 'the best'. I'm a fan. Keep fanning the flames of pre-digested acceptable reality and keep teaching us the insights of Management of Reality. Long ago one of my experimental little theatre shows was titled "Everyday Non-Reality". I didn't buy 'norm' then nor do I now. This essay was delightful and your most Puck-ish one so far.
You are very kind. I think it was a necessary essay, to prepare us mentally for a thorough consideration of the evidence! ;)
Yes. Time will tell... a lot:)
Well, I agree that history in the making is often more insane than the wildest of the scripted scenarios. But is it a proof that history events are being scripted from a scenario written by humans?
I don't think so. In fact, it would rather be quite the opposite.
If the purpose of the show was to deceipt us, then the writers would have resorted to a "credible" story, certainly not one in which exceptionally bad actors run incredibly risky stunts where the actor who has the first role have very high chances of getting actually killed.
This may have been the case if we were in a TV show that tries to keep the audience entertained and strapped to their TV sets. But according to the Management of Reality hypothesis, the bosses only try to cover their tracks making us believe that our votes count while making the real policy decisions. So what would be the purpose of producing a plot so insane that so many would find hard to believe?
History is bigger than anything anyone could ever have imagined.
In the Jewish tradition we say that God rules the world by "מידה כנגד מידה". His Immanent justice punishes the wicked by the exact same measure by which they exert their bad deeds.
The bosses had tried to deceit humanity with distorted reality. So He creates a reality than even them could not have thought about, to destroy their evil plans by their own rules.
You are right in identifying that Trump was once at the core of the show system. And he indeed knows more than anybody how mass media works, how they run a show with politicians to produce deceit. Does this knowledge mean that he shares their goal of enslaving humanity. Not necessarily. But like Moses, who grew up in Paraoh's home was uniquely positioned to free the Hebrew slaves from Egypt, Trump is in the unique position to fight and destroy the system that wants to enslave humanity again.
And God definitely helps him. Sometimes in unbelievable ways.
Your skeptical stance will keep me honest. In Part 2 I will consider the evidence. We'll see what you think then. I'll be interested....
Trump is on a learning curve. He even has a new haircut. He has for example at least one of his dualities that is very interesting. He is actually, an extraordinary Listener!!!! But he chooses how to reply. There have been a few times on the more casual recent interviews (recent as in the leadup to and soon after the election) in some he didn't quite hear a few words from the interviewer. Another of his dualities is that he can be ice cold, when he chooses. But it is so obvious in so many incidents, particularly live situations in which it is blatant he has a LOT of empathy for any average person. There are numerous well known people in journalism etc. who admit to being shocked at how amazingly casual and relaxed and 'down home' Trump is.... when he chooses. One fab example from a few years ago is from super podcaster Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report. As he tells of being at a dinner event with Trump and what happened when they met. At any rate... it is within my Tradition that we wish all leaders to merit the best for making Righteous decisions. We have our own understanding of how to 'manage reality' and how 'reality manages us'. As Ariel I in Comment above noted in his own way. My single favorite line from Shakespeare and I quote it endlessly: "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" - Hamlet to his friend Horatio. Shakespeare to all of us. There is a wonderful 'young' teacher active with a collection of his weekly lessons on youtube. He has a remarkable Mind to say the least. He teaches Science and Maths to high school/undergraduate levels. But he is completely literate in the Jewish canon and exceptionally articulate. His video talks themselves are brilliant state-of-the-art in online presentation! He, one can say, please pardon the simile - he is an expert at explaining the web of the Jewish system of 'managing reality' and/or facing Reality in its complex web of interacting systems. As Homeostasis is said to 'manage' all the systems of Physiology as a Whole. Maybe that is no longer discussed or believed in the worlds of Science? Anyways that wiz bang chilled out teacher is Efraim Palvanov.